2023 Undergraduate Seismic Design Competition
The 2023 Undergraduate Seismic Design Competition will be held in San Francisco, California, from April 11 to April 14!
We hope to see you at the 2023 Undergraduate Seismic Design Competition!
Please click through the above menu links for more information!
Announcements
Announcement 5: 01/15/2023
Hi teams, any damping device proposals are due by 11:59 pm PST on Tuesday, Jan 31, 2023. Additionally, as per the Official Rules, the top 9 proposals will receive bonuses during the competition. This list is as follows (in alphabetical order, NOT placement order):
-
- Cornell University
-
- Istanbul Technical University
-
- Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra
-
- Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest
-
- Technical University of Cluj-Napoca
-
- The University of British Columbia
-
- Universidad Iberoamericana
-
- University of Massachusetts Amherst
- University of Victoria
We can’t wait to see what everyone comes up with and are excited to see y’all at the event in San Francisco, CA!! : D
Announcement 4: 01/06/2023
Hi teams, thanks to all of the teams that have submitted a proposal and congrats to all of the teams whose proposal has been accepted and invited to the competition!! The list of schools invited to the competition can be found below in alphabetical order:
-
- Ain Shams University
-
- Altinbas University
-
- Brigham Young University
-
- Cal Poly Pomona
-
- Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
-
- California State University, Northridge
-
- Cornell University
-
- Helwan University
-
- Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay
-
- Instanbul Technical University
-
- Izmir Katip Çelebi University
-
- McMaster University
-
- New York University
-
- North Carolina State University
-
- Oregon State University
-
- Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra
-
- Purdue University
-
- Seattle University
-
- Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest
-
- Technical University of Cluj-Napoca
-
- The University of British Columbia
-
- The University of Memphis
-
- The University of Texas at Austin
-
- Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas
-
- Universidad Iberoamericana
-
- Universidad Politecnica Salesiana
-
- Universitas Indonesia
-
- University at Buffalo
-
- University of California – Berkeley
-
- University of California – Los Angeles
-
- University of California – San Diego
-
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
-
- University of Massachusetts Amherst
-
- University of Michigan
-
- University of Nevada, Reno
-
- University of Southern California
-
- University of Toronto
- University of Victoria
Announcement 3: 11/21/2022
Hi teams, the Clarifications form is out now! Please go to the “Clarifications” tab and click on the “Clarification Submission” link to go to the form. Please fill it out and your question shall be answered as soon as possible. Answers for all clarification questions can be found on the “Clarifications” tab.
Thanks and good luck with y’alls proposals!! : D
Announcement 2: 10/29/2022
Hi teams, the rules for SDC 2023 are finally out!! Please refer to the “Rules & Competition Documents” Section to find all of the rules documents and read each one carefully. The proposal this year is due on Friday, December 16, 2022 at 11:59 pm PST. Good luck to all of the teams this year!! : D
If your team hasn’t filled out the interest survey but would still like to participate, it’s not too late! Just shoot an email to: sdc@eeri.org
Announcement 1: 10/04/2022
The 2023 Seismic Design Competition (SDC) season is fast approaching! While the rules and regulations are still being finalized by the Student Leadership Council (SLC)’s SDC chairs, the SLC wants to know in advance how many undergraduate teams are interested in competing next year! Please fill out the interest form below (One per school)!
Rules & Competition Documents
Rules
Official Rules 2023
Boring Log
Depth vs Shear Wave Velocity Graph
SDC T-Shirt Competition 2023
Additional Helpful Documents
Design Guide 2023
Glossary 2023
Requirements & Rubrics
Proposal Requirements 2023
Damping Proposal Requirements & Rubric 2023
Architecture Rubric 2023
Poster Requirements 2023
Presentation Requirements 2023
Ground Motions
Important Dates
Please note that all dates are subject to change! Also all cutoffs are 11:59 pm PST.
Milestone | Date / Deadline |
Interest Form | Friday, November 4, 2022 |
Rules Released | Saturday, October 29, 2022 |
Proposal Submission | Friday, December 16, 2022 |
Damping Proposal Submission | Tuesday, January 31, 2023 |
Final Registration Deadline | TBD |
Floor Area Calculations and Performance Predictions Submission | TBD |
Clarifications
If you would like to submit a clarification request, please do so here:
Please click on the questions to see the answers!
A: There are a total of 4 floors designated as retail space: floors f=1, f=2, f=n-1, and f=n. The floor designation is for both towers (i.e., floor f=1 consists of the bottom floor for both towers, even though they are not connected to each other). Figure 9, elevation A-A in the design guide is a helpful visual. A: The location for the competition will be announced soon, but in the meantime you can go with downtown San Francisco. A: The building model can be scaled only for render purposes to show any aesthetic features of the building if it would be constructed in real life. However, for the cost and revenue, no scaling is allowed as the FABI is based on the area of the wooden model. A: Facades and balconies are permitted to extend beyond the structural perimeter. However, livable spaces beyond the structural perimeter are not permitted. A: Any scaling factors considering the building to be a typical real life construction can be used (average height of stories is 14’ giving a scale of 1:56, not more than this). Yes, lofted spaces are permitted as long as they follow the California building and fire codes. A: One tower has to be entirely commercial and the other residential. It is up to the engineer to decide on the assignment. Note that the lowermost and the two uppermost floor levels are retail spaces. All the sky bridges, and not the entire sky bridge floor, will be leased as retail space. A: In Q1.5 we stated that any scaling factors considering the building to be a typical real life construction can be used. If the average height of a story is 14’, then the scaling factor would be 1:56, which is the average, not the maximum. Please select scaling factors that would yield “typical real life construction”. A: Participants should stick to the provided ratio and follow the response from the previous clarification. A: The damping device is not required to be designed to be removable during the competition. This section is meant to specify that damping devices should not affect the stability of the structure, rather as a supplemental element to assist in energy dissipation. It will be obvious if stability is compromised if damping devices were to be removed from the structure. Hence, in case SDC Chairs determine that the damping devices must be removed, it would benefit teams to design their devices in a way that extraction of the devices would be relatively straightforward and wouldn’t compromise the structural integrity of the tower. A: The due date of the damping proposal will be announced to the teams soon. It will be on a separate date from the design proposal submission. A: The skybridges need to be centered between the two towers, i.e., they cannot be staggered from each other. This is further clarified in the Design Guide, Section 4, Floor Requirements. A: The roof plate needs to be touching the two towers and the skybridges. We will accept that there are minor areas where the roof plate will not be touching anything, however, it needs to be centered in the building and touching the skybridge and the two towers. Please click here to see illustrative sketch (not drawn to scale). A: Curtain walls as non-structural elements should not be in the actual physical model but can be added in the architectural rendering. Furthermore, gusset plates are not curtain walls. Gusset plates are permitted but shall not be in contact with any wall members. A gusset plate shall be in contact with and glued to at least two frame members in contact. Each gusset plate shall fit in a 0.100 in. by 1 in. by 1 in. box. Also, each individual wall member in its final state attached to the model shall fit in a 0.100 in. by 3.000 in. by 11.000 in. box. A: Refer to Figure 12 in the Design Guide, especially to the top left X bracing orientation for the floor rentable area. For an area to be counted as rentable area, a span from any point perpendicular to a beam bordering the opening has to be 2.5 inches or less. A: There is no restriction on how to connect the sky bridges to other structural elements as long as you abide by the other rules mentioned in the “Design Guide”. The topmost skybridge has to have two crosswalks. A: No, If you use the area on the roof of the skybridge, you will use it for your rentable area. So you are not allowed to put any members on the top of the skybridge as the roof is not counted as a rentable area! A: The measured dimensions parallel to the base plate must be a minimum of 1 in. A shape with a vertex would not meet those requirements. The wall member can be cut in any way as long as it fits the box dimensions of 0.100 in. by 3.000 in. by 11.000 and meets the minimum requirements mentioned in Section 7.3a. A: Any member glued to a wall must meet the requirements of Section 7.4a. The glue can only be present at the fraying surface of the individual members. For example, the section states: “any members in contact must have glue between the faying surfaces of the two members.” In addition, “excess glue must be confined to 0.5 in. in any direction of the edge of any faying surface.” Each violation of the members’ connection will result in 3 added to V. A: Lamination of two plywood plates to make up for the required thickness is accepted as long as there is no space (gap) between the two sheets. On the other hand, dowel pins are not accepted. However, the SLC strongly encourages the team to use a single 0.5-in thick plate if possible. A: Paint or coating is not allowed on any portion of the model no matter if it is baseplate or not! A: Any member glued to a wall must meet the requirements of Section 7.4a. The glue can only be present at the fraying surface of the individual members. For example, the section states: “any members in contact must have glue between the faying surfaces of the two members.” In addition, “excess glue must be confined to 0.5 in. in any direction of the edge of any faying surface.” Each violation of the members’ connection will result in 3 added to V. A: The floor dead loads are installed at specific floor levels only. The details can be found in section 8.3 of the ‘Official Rules’ and section 5 and 8 of ‘Design Guide’. A: Please refer to section 8.3b of the ‘Official rules’. A: The rods that will be used in this year’s competition will have the same dimensions as the previous year: 0.5 inch diameter and 12 inch long. A: The teams don’t have to bring their accelerometer. The SDC organizing committee will provide the accelerometer and perform the post-processing based on standard practice. A: A suitable low pass filter to remove noise from the obtained data will be used. The filter is calibrated based on the shake table and the same post processing will be used for all the teams. A: The ground motions are artificial and not based on an actual earthquake event, therefore they do not have a corresponding recording station. The ground motions are based on the geographic location and the structural response of this year’s design challenge. A: The teams will be able to work on the first day of the competition until we start the preliminary judging. Roughly the students have until 6 pm of that day to fix any damages that might occur from the transportation process. However, once we start the preliminary judging the students are not allowed to touch the building. A: Yes, dedicated space with a mailing address will be provided. The details will be provided soon. A: No, you do not need to have the student chapter officially established. We understand that it takes time to establish the chapter, and you are actively working on getting the approval for an official chapter. We welcome your participation and encourage you to follow up with EERI about your student chapter status. A: The dimensions of any skybridge needs to be on the same level as the floor it exists on. Furthermore, the minimum and maximum clear distance between the skybridges needs to be maintained as mentioned in the design guide. They will be measured with the level of the floor. If you maintain the horizontal level of the skybridge with the floor with no members higher or lower, then it should be fine. A: The teams don’t have to bring the steel angles. The SDC organizing committee will provide them. A: Any shape that has a minimum vertical height of 1” at all horizontal points and has a minimum horizontal dimension of 1” will satisfy the requirement. The example shape described in the question will satisfy the requirement provided it has a minimum horizontal dimension of 1”. A: No limitations as long as the surface remains flat and smooth. Typically, teams notch the entire thickness to get a bigger surface area. A: Dead loads are provided at the competition. A: The wall member can be a maximum of 3” as shown in Figure 3 of the Design Guide. A: If your damper was inspired from an existing damper implemented in a real building, then provide a cost of implementing the damper, if available. However, if your damper is unique and wasn’t implemented before, please provide a prediction of how much it will cost to implement a hypothetical real-life, full scale counterpart.1. Introduction
6. Design Proposals and Damping Device Approval Process
7. Structural Model
8. Strong Ground Motion Testing
11. Judging and Appeals
12. Design Guide
13. Damping Proposal Requirements
Results
Top 9 Proposals (in alphabetical order)
-
- Cornell University
-
- Istanbul Technical University
-
- Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra
-
- Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest
-
- Technical University of Cluj-Napoca
-
- The University of British Columbia
-
- Universidad Iberoamericana
-
- University of Massachusetts Amherst
- University of Victoria
Full Results
The results for the 2023 Seismic Design Competition are here! To download a copy of the score pdf, just click on the title and you can download it from there.
Congratulations to all of the teams that participated this year! We hope you learned a lot and hope to see you next year! : D
Summary
1st Place: Technical University of Cluj-Napoca
2nd Place: University at Buffalo
3rd Place: Cornell University
Charles Richter Award for Spirit of the Competition: The University of Texas at Austin
Egor Popov Award for Structural Innovation: Cornell University
T-Shirt Design: Technical University of Cluj-Napoca (Honorable mentions: Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest and Universidad Iberoamericana)
Best Seismic Performance: The University of Memphis
Best Communication Skills Award: The University of British Columbia
Best Architecture Award: Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest
Most Improved Team: University at Buffalo
Rookie of the SDC Award: Altınbaş University